简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Multimillion-Dollar FX Ponzi Scheme Unveiled by CFTC
Abstract:The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) recently took action against Darren Robinson and his Wyoming-based firm for orchestrating a fraudulent forex scheme, resulting in a hefty judgment of over $5.9 million in restitution and civil penalties.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) recently took action against Darren Robinson and his Wyoming-based firm for orchestrating a fraudulent forex scheme, resulting in a hefty judgment of over $5.9 million in restitution and civil penalties. Robinson, formerly residing in Florida, operated The QYU Holdings (QYUHI) as a commodity pool operator from January 1, 2017, to September 28, 2023, without proper registration with the CFTC, as mandated by law.
The CFTC emphasized that QYUHI failed to adhere to Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) regulations, marking a breach that led to the enforcement action against Robinson and QYUHI. These regulatory violations came to light in the official announcement issued by the CFTC last Friday, highlighting the resolution of the enforcement action through a court order.

Robinson, who remains at large, faces criminal charges, including 11 counts of wire fraud and one count of money laundering. The charges stem from a fraudulent scheme where Robinson and QYUHI solicited approximately $7.2 million from 38 individuals to participate in a commodity pool operated by the company. Despite promising to trade commodity interests, including forex pairs, with participants, the funds were diverted into QYUHI‘s corporate bank account under Robinson’s control.
Instead of using the funds for their intended purpose, Robinson misappropriated them for personal expenses, ranging from luxury cruises to real estate purchases, highlighting egregious misconduct. Furthermore, Robinson utilized a portion of the funds to fulfil purported “profits” and “redemptions” for earlier participants, resembling characteristics of a Ponzi scheme.
While the court order mandates repayment to victims, the CFTC cautioned that recovery of lost funds may not be feasible due to potential insufficiency of the wrongdoers assets. Nevertheless, the regulator affirmed its commitment to protecting customers and holding wrongdoers accountable, signalling continued efforts to uphold market integrity and safeguard investors.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | Kazuaki Takabatake, CCO of Titan FX
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr
