简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Unveiling Fraud: FPFX vs. Funded Engineer Legal Battle
Abstract:Amidst an ongoing legal battle, Tristian Talbot and Harri Jean David Sawicki, reportedly overseeing Funded Engineer and its crucial website, face dispute resolution in Palm Beach County, Florida, over alleged contractual breaches following an FPFX audit revealing manipulative practices, triggering significant revenue losses and terminated agreements.

Tristian Talbot, based in Thailand, and Harri Jean David Sawicki, residing in Vietnam, allegedly oversee Funded Engineer and its website, which are at the heart of an ongoing legal dispute. The legal proceedings are set to take place in Palm Beach County, Florida, in accordance with the original agreement's dispute resolution clause.
FPFX‘s complaint outlines that under a software services agreement dated June 2, 2023, the defendants were granted rights to utilize FPFX’s software, with obligations to pay monthly fees and other specified amounts. However, an FPFX audit conducted in January 2024 revealed alleged record manipulation by the defendants, aimed at reducing payments owed under the agreement. This included the creation of fabricated trading accounts and participation in “wash trading,” practices resulting in an estimated revenue loss of $700,000 for FPFX.
In response to what FPFX labels as “nefarious, illegal, and unethical activities,” the vendor terminated the agreement on February 7, 2024. In March, FPFX initiated a demand for mediation in accordance with the contracts terms to resolve the dispute.

The investigation identified various fraudulent actions conducted by Funded Engineer, including the creation of fictitious trading accounts, bypassing Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols, engaging in wash trading, and fabricating payouts. These activities aimed to overstate the firms payment activities, thus misleading traders and FPFX Tech.
Specific findings from the audit revealed that Funded Engineer manually created seemingly fake user profiles in their administrative portal. These profiles, lacking any payment history or billing details, were directly provided with funded accounts, circumventing the firms usual requirement for traders to complete a challenge before obtaining such accounts.
Further infractions included manually overriding AML/KYC checks, allowing individuals to be approved for funded accounts without standard due diligence. Additionally, Funded Engineer‘s personnel engaged in wash trading, solely to inflate the firm’s pay-out statistics.
The audit also revealed that despite approving pay-outs in the system, Funded Engineer did not disburse any funds to these fictitious accounts. Instead, the prop firm purportedly pretended to make payments through cryptocurrency wallets and global payroll services without corresponding blockchain transactions.
FPFX Techs probe concluded that Funded Engineer had overstated its pay-outs by more than $2 million, a fact promoted by one of its founders, Tristian Talbot, on social media.
Following FPFXs decision to terminate its licensing agreement, Funded Engineer issued a series of updates addressing the situation.
The firm expressed disappointment over the abrupt termination and the subsequent negative public relations campaign launched by FPFX Tech, noting that this occurred without warning or an opportunity for dialogue.
Funded Engineer expressed surprise and concern over how their services were terminated and how they were removed from all past communications by FPFX Tech. The firm criticized the lack of communication prior to the action and the negative PR campaign that ensued, adding that they were not approached for comment on the allegations.
Regarding the allegations, Funded Engineer stated that the matter has become a legal case, limiting their ability to share further details publicly. However, the firm assured its community that it is treating the situation with the utmost seriousness.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | Kazuaki Takabatake, CCO of Titan FX
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr
