简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
4XC Forex Broker Review 2025: Unregulated Risks, Expired License, and Rising Complaints
Abstract:Is 4XC safe? Our 2025 review covers its expired license, offshore setup, fees, user complaints, and trading conditions.

In the volatile forex landscape of 2025, where regulatory scrutiny is at an all-time high, brokers like 4XC (operating under 4xCube Ltd) promise low barriers to entry and diverse assets but raise serious red flags due to its expired license and mounting user complaints. With a WikiFX score of just 2.14/10, driven by “too many complaints” and a lack of valid oversight, is 4XC a viable option or a potential pitfall? This updated review draws on the latest WikiFX data, recent regulatory analyses, and trader feedback to dissect the broker's operations. From its Cook Islands roots to withdrawal woes, we cover it all to equip you with the facts before risking your capital.

(Screenshot: 4XC's WikiFX profile showing a low 2.14/10 score, no regulation)
Company Overview: Offshore Origins and Limited Transparency
Established in 2015 and headquartered at 1st Floor, BCI House, Avarua, Rarotonga, Cook Islands, 4XC targets global traders (excluding high-risk regions like the USA, Iraq, and North Korea). It offers a demo account for testing and 24/5 support via live chat, email (support@4xc.com), phone (+44 8000 488 033), WhatsApp, and social media (Facebook, Instagram, etc.). The website (https://4xc.com/) is intuitive, supporting MT4/MT5 white-label platforms with TradingView integration. Tradable assets include Forex, Metals (XAU/USD), Indices, Oil, Cryptocurrencies, and Forward Contracts—but no stocks, bonds, or ETFs.
While it boasts 5-10 years of experience, transparency is lacking: No clear ownership details beyond links to UK-based GEOMATRIX LTD (est. 2020). Recent audits claim external verification, but without top-tier regulation, these ring hollow.
Regulation and Licenses: Expired FSC
Regulation is non-negotiable in 2025, yet 4XC's status is dire. It once held a Common Business Registration from the Cook Islands Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC, License MC03/2018 under 4XCUBE LIMITED), effective from 2023-09-19 to 2024-09-18.

As of October 10, 2025, this license is “exceeded and expired”, per WikiFX verification, leaving the broker with zero valid oversight. WikiFX labels it a “suspicious regulatory license” with high risk, scoring regulation at 0.00/10.

Furthermore, 4XC has previously been warned by regulators in Ukraine (National Securities and Stock Market Commission, NSSMC) and Brazil (Securities and Exchange Commission, CVM) for unauthorized and irregular operations, including listings on investor protection blacklists and immediate suspensions of public investment offerings in securities.

(Screenshot: 4XC listed on Ukraine's NSSMC investor protection registry as of 2025, highlighting potential risks for unauthorized activities.)

(Screenshot: Brazil's CVM 2023 alert determining immediate suspension of 4XC's public investment offers due to irregular brokerage actions by 4xCube Ltd.)
Trading Conditions: Appealing Specs Marred by Risks
4XC's setup is trader-friendly on paper: White-label MT4/MT5 (UK server, 101.67 ms execution) supports scalping and hedging with no requotes. Leverage hits 1:500 for Forex (1:200 for others, 1:20 for crypto). Spreads start at 0.0 pips on PRO/VIP accounts, with market execution. Islamic (swap-free) options are limited to Standard accounts.
However, without regulation, these features amplify dangers—think slippage in volatility or unaddressed disputes. Recent 2025 reviews note AI signals via Acuity Trading, but complaints highlight execution delays during peaks.
| Trading Feature | Details | Risk Note |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, TradingView | White-label; potential manipulation |
| Leverage (Max) | 1:500 (Forex) | High risk without negative balance protection enforcement |
| Spreads | 0.0 pips (PRO/VIP) | Competitive, but complaints of widening |
| Execution Speed | 101.67 ms | Adequate, yet unverified in disputes |
Account Types: Low Entry, But Hidden Fees Lurk
Three live accounts plus demo, all in USD/EUR/GBP with no deposit fees:
| Account Type | Min. Deposit | Max Leverage | Spreads From | Commission (per Lot) | Islamic? |
| PRO | $100 | 1:500 | 0.0 pips | $5 | No |
| Standard | $50 | 1:500 | 1.0 pips | None | Yes |
| VIP | $5,000 | 1:500 | 0.0 pips | $4 | No |
Standard suits beginners, but inactivity fees ($50/month after 3 months) and high withdrawal costs erode value.
User Reviews
On the WikiFX platform, user feedback for 4XC primarily focuses on obstacles in the withdrawal process and the lack of trading transparency.
Users report frequent refusals without explanation, inability to access account funds, and opaque trading records that cannot be viewed via MT4/MT5 or obtained as detailed statements.

(Screenshot: Real user exposures on WikiFX highlighting account empties, transparency gaps, and withdrawal barriers.)
Strengths and Weaknesses: The Good, Bad, and Ugly
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
| Low $50 min. deposit | Expired FSC license; no regulation |
| High leverage (1:500) | Withdrawal delays/denials; high fees |
| Diverse payments (15+ methods) | Surging complaints (profits blocked, liquidations) |
| Demo + Islamic accounts | Offshore opacity; scam associations |
| Fast execution (101 ms) | Inactivity fees; limited asset variety |
Conclusion: High Risk – Steer Clear in 2025
4XC's expired license, regulatory voids, and 2025 complaint spike (from profit sabotage to withdrawal fraud) make it a no-go for prudent traders. Despite some positives like low spreads, the risks outweigh rewards—opt for top-tier regulated alternatives via WikiFX. Forex trading is risky; always demo first and verify licenses.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
