简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FINRA Fines United Capital Markets $25,000
Abstract:FINRA fined and censured United Capital Markets $25,000 for supervisory gaps and unapproved, exaggerated retail communications in 2018–2019.

FINRA has censured and fined United Capital Markets $25,000 after finding the firm failed to maintain a reasonable supervisory system over a senior executives equities and options trading and circulated unapproved retail communications with exaggerated claims between 2018 and 2019, in violation of FINRA Rules 3110, 2210, and 2010.
Findings Overview
FINRA determined that from January 2018 to December 2019, the firm lacked written supervisory procedures that designated who oversaw a senior executive‘s trading in equities and options, leaving the executive effectively supervising personal activity without documented controls required under Rule 3110(a)–(b). The WSPs also omitted any guidance for supervising equities and options activity, meaning there were no procedures for monitoring the executive’s trades in those product areas, a failure cited as contrary to Rules 3110 and 2010.

Communications Violations
Between January 2018 and February 2019, UCM distributed eight retail communications that were not pre‑reviewed and approved by a qualified principal as required by Rule 2210, and the materials included language deemed exaggerated and not fair and balanced. Examples included characterizations such as “TRADE OF THE CENTURY” and claims that a company was “best in the world,” which FINRA found violated the content standards of Rule 2210(d) and the high‑level conduct rule, 2010.
Sanctions And Firm Context
Under the settlement, United Capital Markets accepted a censure and a $25,000 fine tied to the supervisory and communications violations identified by FINRA. UCM has been a FINRA member since June 1996, employs 10 registered representatives at its Miami, Florida headquarters, and focuses primarily on debt securities, despite the cited gaps relating to equities and options oversight.
Why It Matters For Compliance
The case underscores that Rule 3110 requires explicit responsibility mapping and product‑specific procedures, especially where senior personnel might otherwise oversee their own activity. It also reinforces that retail communications must be approved by a qualified principal before use and must present balanced, accurate claims under Rule 2210s content standards.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Fidelity Exposed: Traders Complain About Withdrawal Denials, Frozen Accounts & Platform Glitches
Does Fidelity Investments prevent you from accessing funds despite numerous assurances on your requests? Do you witness an account freeze by the US-based forex broker every time you request withdrawal access? Do you struggle with an unstable trading platform here? Is the slow Fidelity customer service making you face forced liquidation? These issues haunt traders, with many of them voicing their frustration on several broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this Fidelity review article, we have shared quite a few complaints for you to look at. Read on!

Exposing The Trading Pit: Traders Blame the Broker for Unfair Withdrawal Denials & Account Blocks
Did you receive contradictory emails from The Trading Pit, with one approving payout and another rejecting it, citing trading rule violations? Did you purchase multiple trading accounts but receive a payout on only one of them? Did The Trading Pit prop firm refund you for the remaining accounts without clear reasoning? Did you face account bans despite using limited margins and keeping investment risks to a minimum? These are some raging complaints found under The Trading Pit review. We will share some of these complaints in this article. Take a look.

M&G Review: Traders Report Fund Scams, Misleading Market Info & False Return Promises
Applying for multiple withdrawals at M&G Investments but not getting it into your bank account? Do you see the uncredited withdrawal funds out of your forex trading account on the M&G login? Does the customer support service fail to address this trading issue? Does the misleading market information provided on this forex broker’s trading platform make you lose all your invested capital? Were you lured into investing under the promise of guaranteed forex returns? These issues have become highly common for traders at M&G Investments. In this M&G review article, we have echoed investor sentiments through their complaint screenshots. Take a look!

INZO Broker MT5 Review 2025: A Trader's Guide to Features, Fees and Risks
INZO is a foreign exchange (Forex) and Contracts for Difference (CFD) brokerage company that started working in 2021. The company is registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and regulated offshore. It focuses on serving clients around the world by giving them access to popular trading platforms, especially MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader. The company offers different types of trading instruments, from currency pairs to cryptocurrencies. It aims to help both new and experienced traders. Read on to know more about it.
