简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Citibank Sued in $20M Romance Scam Tied to Fraudulent Transfers
Abstract:Citibank faces a lawsuit over a $20M romance scam. Plaintiff alleges the bank enabled fraud by failing to block suspicious transfers.

Citibank is at the center of a growing controversy as it faces a high-profile legal battle in federal court. The financial giant has been named in a lawsuit filed by Michael Zidell, who claims he was the victim of a sophisticated romance scam that funneled millions through Citibank accounts. The Citibank Romance Scam Lawsuit accuses the bank of negligence and failure to detect blatant fraud warning signs.
Zidell alleges that scammers, posing as a romantic interest, manipulated him into transferring over $20 million in total, with nearly $4 million routed through Citibank. The complaint, filed in Manhattan federal court, argues that Citibank violated its legal obligations by processing suspicious transactions without proper scrutiny.
The lawsuit stems from a scam that began in early 2023 when Zidell met a woman using the name “Carolyn Parker” on Facebook. The two developed an online romantic relationship, during which Parker persuaded Zidell to invest in NFTs via a trading platform she recommended. Zidell claims the platform was part of an elaborate romance scam money laundering Citibank scheme designed to defraud him.

Over the course of several months, Zidell executed 43 separate transfers to various bank accounts, trusting the platforms assurance that multiple banks were required for handling large investment volumes. Of those, 12 transfers—totaling approximately $4 million—were directed to accounts at Citibank under the name Guju Inc.
According to the complaint, the nature of the transfers—large, round sums sent in rapid succession—should have raised immediate red flags. The $20 million scam Citibank news story is rapidly gaining attention as the case underscores the growing threat of romance scams involving cryptocurrency and unregulated investment platforms.
Zidell contends that Citibank failed to conduct adequate due diligence, monitor account activity, or apply proper anti-money laundering protocols. The suit forms part of a broader Citibank fraud case 2025 update, where financial institutions are being scrutinized for their role—or inaction—in enabling scams.
Romance scams, particularly those involving crypto “pig butchering” schemes, are surging. In 2024 alone, losses exceeded $9.9 billion globally. With U.S. authorities intensifying enforcement and already seizing hundreds of millions in related assets, Citibank sued over Fraud 2025 case could set a legal precedent for banks responsibilities in combating financial exploitation.
Citibank has yet to issue a public comment on the matter.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Exposing The Trading Pit: Traders Blame the Broker for Unfair Withdrawal Denials & Account Blocks
Did you receive contradictory emails from The Trading Pit, with one approving payout and another rejecting it, citing trading rule violations? Did you purchase multiple trading accounts but receive a payout on only one of them? Did The Trading Pit prop firm refund you for the remaining accounts without clear reasoning? Did you face account bans despite using limited margins and keeping investment risks to a minimum? These are some raging complaints found under The Trading Pit review. We will share some of these complaints in this article. Take a look.

M&G Review: Traders Report Fund Scams, Misleading Market Info & False Return Promises
Applying for multiple withdrawals at M&G Investments but not getting it into your bank account? Do you see the uncredited withdrawal funds out of your forex trading account on the M&G login? Does the customer support service fail to address this trading issue? Does the misleading market information provided on this forex broker’s trading platform make you lose all your invested capital? Were you lured into investing under the promise of guaranteed forex returns? These issues have become highly common for traders at M&G Investments. In this M&G review article, we have echoed investor sentiments through their complaint screenshots. Take a look!

Trading Pro Review: Scam Broker Exposed
Trading Pro Review reveals scam alerts, fake offices, and withdrawal issues. Stay cautious with this unregulated broker.

FCA Warning List of Firms to Avoid: November 2025 Update
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK has published the FCA Warning List Firms to Avoid:- November 2025, alerting forex traders and investors about unauthorized brokers. These firms are operating without the necessary FCA approval. To safeguard your funds and avoid scams, be sure to check the full warning list below.
