简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
ASIC Shuts Down 95 Scam Companies in Major Crackdown on Fraud
Abstract:The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has received Federal Court approval to shut down 95 companies involved in suspected investment scams.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has received Federal Court approval to shut down 95 companies involved in suspected investment scams. This follows a major investigation revealing how these businesses were used to trick people into investing in fake trading schemes.
The court found that the companies had been set up with false information and had no proper management. It ruled they should be closed on “just and equitable” grounds. Most of the companies had no real assets and were not conducting any genuine business.
Many were connected to websites and apps that appeared to offer trading in foreign exchange, cryptocurrencies, and commodities. In reality, these platforms were part of complex scams designed to steal money from investors.
One common tactic was a type of scam known as “Sha Zhu Pan”, or “pig butchering”. This method is often linked to organised crime groups in Southeast Asia. It involves scammers building personal relationships with victims online before convincing them to invest in fake trading accounts.

According to the court, the scammers would first gain the victims trust, often through social media. Over time, they would introduce the idea of investing. The trading platforms were manipulated to show fake profits, which encouraged victims to invest even more money. But when they tried to withdraw their funds, the money was gone.

Read here to learn why scammers let you win during the initial phase: https://www.wikifx.com/en/newsdetail/202503148244401400.html
At the time of the court hearing, liquidators had already received around 1,500 claims from people who lost money. The total amount of claims was over AUD 35 million. It is unclear whether this figure includes both the original investments and the promised profits.
Only two of the companies had any significant assets, and none appeared to be active businesses. This suggested that the companies were created mainly to support the scams.
Justice Angus Stewart, who issued the courts ruling, described how victims were slowly manipulated until they were convinced to invest large amounts of money. He said the scam was like “fattening pigs for slaughter”.
ASIC‘s Deputy Chair, Sarah Court, said many of the companies were designed to look like real businesses, giving the scams a sense of credibility. She said ASIC’s action was necessary to protect the public from fake companies with no proper oversight.
However, Court warned that shutting down one scam is not the end of the problem. She compared the situation to a hydra - when one head is cut off, two more grow in its place.
Catherine Conneely and Thomas Birch from Cor Cordis have been appointed as joint liquidators. They will now oversee the process of closing down the companies and investigating any remaining assets.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
