简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Lawsuit Claims Elon Musk Cheated Twitter Shareholders Out of $150 Million
Abstract:The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit alleging that Elon Musk, the billionaire founder of Tesla and SpaceX, cheated Twitter shareholders out of more than $150 million by delaying the disclosure of his growing stake in the company as he prepared to launch a takeover bid.

According to report, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit alleging that Elon Musk, the billionaire founder of Tesla and SpaceX, cheated Twitter shareholders out of more than $150 million by delaying the disclosure of his growing stake in the company as he prepared to launch a takeover bid. The lawsuit, which was filed just days before the Trump administration took office, adds to Musk's long-running tension with the SEC, particularly regarding his role in taking Twitter private.
The SECs Allegations
According to the SEC's complaint, Musk violated securities laws by failing to notify the public promptly about his growing stake in Twitter. The Commission claims Musk accumulated a large number of Twitter shares between January and March 2022, eventually leading to an ownership stake above 5%, a threshold that would have required him to disclose the purchase within 10 days under federal regulations.
Instead, Musk allegedly delayed making the required filing, thus allowing him to accumulate even more shares at a lower price before he ultimately announced his plans to acquire the company in April 2022. By failing to disclose his stake promptly, Musk allegedly misled Twitter investors, artificially inflating the stock price and depriving them of a chance to make informed decisions about their holdings.
The SEC claims this delay resulted in Twitter shareholders losing out on more than $150 million in potential profits. If Musk had disclosed his growing stake on time, shareholders could have potentially sold their shares at a higher price during the period when Musk was gradually accumulating them.
Musks Defense
Musk‘s legal team quickly responded to the SEC’s lawsuit, asserting that the billionaire did nothing wrong and that the SEC‘s case was without merit. Musk’s attorney argued that the SEC was engaging in a baseless attack, claiming that Musk had not violated any securities laws by waiting to disclose his stake. The lawyer insisted that Musk‘s actions were perfectly legal and that the SEC’s claims lacked sufficient evidence to warrant a lawsuit.
Musk himself has made no public statement regarding the latest lawsuit, but he has a history of contentious interactions with the SEC. In 2018, the SEC sued Musk for his Twitter post in which he claimed he had secured funding to take Tesla private at $420 a share—a statement that caused Tesla's stock price to jump. Musk ultimately settled that case by paying a $20 million civil fine, agreeing to have Tesla‘s lawyers vet certain tweets, and stepping down as Tesla’s chairman for three years.

FILE PHOTO: Elon Musk · Reuters
Musks legal battles with the SEC, including his ongoing dispute over his Twitter posts, have painted a complex picture of a billionaire who is unafraid to challenge regulatory authority. While his business empire—spanning electric vehicles, space exploration, and more—has earned him vast wealth and fame, it has also drawn him into frequent confrontations with regulators.
Other Lawsuits Related to Twitter Acquisition
In addition to the SEC‘s lawsuit, Musk faces other legal challenges related to his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter. Shareholders and investors have raised concerns about Musk’s handling of the deal, citing issues such as changes to Twitters management and operations following the acquisition, and allegations of stock manipulation. Musk has also been accused of failing to disclose key information to Twitter shareholders during the bidding process.
As the legal and financial fallout from Musk‘s Twitter purchase continues to unfold, his critics argue that his actions may have harmed both investors and the broader market. However, Musk’s defenders maintain that he acted within the law and that the SECs lawsuit is just another example of government overreach.
Conclusion
Musks legal battles are far from over, but as he faces multiple lawsuits over his Twitter purchase, the implications for both Twitter shareholders and broader market regulations will continue to evolve. For now, Musk remains defiant, and his complex relationship with the SEC shows no signs of ending anytime soon.
The SEC lawsuit marks the latest chapter in Elon Musk‘s long-running legal and regulatory troubles. As the case progresses, it will serve as a critical reminder of the importance of timely disclosures in the world of corporate acquisitions. Whether Musk’s legal strategy will succeed in defeating the SECs claims remains to be seen, but the case will undoubtedly attract continued attention from investors, regulators, and industry watchers alike.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
