简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Investment Scams in Malaysia: Telegram Tops Scammers’ List
Abstract:In the first 11 months of 2024, Malaysia recorded 5,685 investment scams, with Telegram emerging as the most commonly used platform for fraudulent activities.

In the first 11 months of 2024, Malaysia recorded 5,685 investment scams, with Telegram emerging as the most commonly used platform for fraudulent activities. The Bukit Aman Commercial Crime Investigation Department revealed alarming statistics, shedding light on the growing threat of online scams.

Department Director Datuk Seri Nanni reported that Telegram accounted for 1,832 cases of investment fraud, surpassing other platforms such as Facebook (1,436 cases), WhatsApp (1,378 cases), and Instagram (145 cases). An additional 417 cases involved other platforms, while 477 incidents occurred through face-to-face communication.
Speaking at a press conference, Nanni highlighted that up to 15 November 2024, the police received 30,724 reports of commercial crimes, with total losses amounting to RM2.774 billion. Among these, 13,721 cases—or 45%—have been brought to court.
The press conference also addressed the prevalence of e-commerce fraud. Police received 6,909 reports of such cases during the same period, resulting in losses totalling RM62.2 million. Facebook led as the most frequently used platform for e-commerce fraud, with 3,457 cases, followed by WhatsApp (1,168 cases), TikTok (800 cases), and Telegram (771 cases).
In addition to investment and e-commerce scams, illegal money lending remains a concern. Despite a rising trend over the past three years, police efforts have led to a decline in such cases in 2024.
From January to November 2024, authorities recorded 981 cases of illegal money lending, compared to 1,162 cases in 2023, 989 cases in 2022, and 977 cases in 2021. To combat the issue, the police launched targeted operations, resulting in the arrest of 4,737 individuals between 2021 and November 2024.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

In-Depth Uniglobe Markets Commission Fees and Spreads Analysis – What Traders Should Really Know
For experienced traders, the cost of execution is a critical factor in broker selection. Low spreads, fair commissions, and transparent pricing can be the difference between a profitable and a losing strategy over the long term. This has led many to scrutinize the offerings of brokers like Uniglobe Markets, which presents a tiered account structure promising competitive conditions. However, a professional evaluation demands more than a surface-level look at marketing claims. It requires a deep, data-driven analysis of the real trading costs, set against the backdrop of the broker's operational integrity and safety. This comprehensive Uniglobe Markets commission fees and spreads analysis will deconstruct the broker's pricing model, examining its account types, typical spreads, commission policies, and potential ancillary costs. Using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform WikiFX, we will provide a clear-eyed view of the Uniglobe Markets spreads commissions prici

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Regulation and Oversight – A Trader's Guide to the Risks
For experienced traders, the process of selecting a new broker transcends a simple comparison of spreads and leverage. It is a meticulous due diligence exercise where the integrity of the broker's regulatory framework is paramount. Stonefort Securities, a relatively new entrant in the crowded brokerage space, presents a complex and often contradictory profile. On one hand, it boasts a modern MT5 platform and a stream of positive user testimonials. On the other hand, it is shadowed by severe regulatory warnings that question the very foundation of its operations. This in-depth review focuses on the core issue for any long-term trader: Stonefort Securities regulation and oversight. We will dissect the broker's corporate structure, scrutinize its licensing claims, and analyze what the data implies for trader protection and fund security. For traders evaluating whether Stonefort Securities is a trustworthy partner, understanding these details is not just important—it is essential.

FXPesa Review: Are Traders Facing High Slippage, Fund Losses & Withdrawal Denials?
Do FXPesa support officials fail to pick up your calls when you raise fund withdrawal requests with the broker? But are these officials always open to you regarding fund deposits? Do you frequently spot slippage and stop-loss order execution errors on the FXPesa login? These issues are increasingly becoming common with this forex broker. Consequently, many traders have expressed their dissatisfaction with the broker online. In this FXPesa Review article, we have shared some of these complaints. Take a look!

Trive Investigation: High Score, Hidden Risk - The Profit Paradox
A disturbing pattern has emerged regarding the broker Trive. Despite holding a high WikiFX score (7.91) and valid licenses in South Africa and Australia, recent investor reports suggest a significant disconnect between the platform's reputation and its treatment of profitable clients. While the regulatory paperwork appears in order, our data indicates that traders are facing sudden account freezes and accusations of "trading abuse" precisely when they attempt to withdraw profits. This report investigates why a seemingly "safe" broker is generating high-risk complaints.
