简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FCA Identifies Clone Firm Exploiting Admiral Markets' Credibility
Abstract:The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a public warning regarding a fraudulent entity impersonating Admiral Markets, a legitimate and authorised trading firm. The clone firm, operating under the name Admiral EU Brokers and the domain Admiraleubrokerz.com, has been falsely presenting itself as an FCA-authorised business.

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a public warning regarding a fraudulent entity impersonating Admiral Markets, a legitimate and authorised trading firm. The clone firm, operating under the name Admiral EU Brokers and the domain Admiraleubrokerz.com, has been falsely presenting itself as an FCA-authorised business.
Clone firms are unauthorised entities that exploit the identities of legitimate firms, using their names, logos, and other details to mislead unsuspecting individuals. While these fraudulent entities may appear credible, they are not connected in any way to the authorised firms they mimic.
The FCA has specifically identified Admiral EU Brokers as a clone of Admiral Markets UK Ltd, a regulated and authorised financial services provider. Despite their attempts to impersonate the legitimate firm, Admiral EU Brokers is not authorised to operate in the UK. The FCA has urged the public to avoid engaging with this clone entity, warning of the potential risks involved.
The fraudulent firm Admiral EU Brokers operates under the email address assistenza.clienti@admiraleubrokerz.com and runs its activities through the website www.admiraleubrokerz.com.

The FCA has highlighted the significant risks of engaging with clone firms. Individuals who deal with such fraudulent entities are not eligible for protection under the Financial Ombudsman Service, which handles disputes between financial businesses and their customers. Furthermore, victims of clone firms are excluded from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), meaning they are unlikely to recover their funds if the clone firm becomes insolvent or fails to honour its obligations.
To safeguard against such scams, the FCA strongly advises individuals to verify the legitimacy of financial firms before entering into any agreements. This includes checking a firm's details on the FCA Register to ensure all contact information aligns with the official records. Any inconsistencies in the information provided could be a clear indication of fraudulent activity.

To help protect individuals from falling prey to unauthorised investment schemes or firms, WikiFX offers essential tools and resources for verifying the legitimacy of brokers and financial platforms. With an extensive database of global broker profiles, regulatory status updates, and user reviews, WikiFX empowers users to make informed decisions before committing to any financial investment. The apps risk ratings and alerts for unlicensed or suspicious entities enable investors to easily spot red flags and avoid potential scams. By checking a broker's background on WikiFX, users can better safeguard their hard-earned savings and steer clear of fraudulent schemes, making WikiFX an indispensable resource for safer investing.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | Kazuaki Takabatake, CCO of Titan FX
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr
