简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
IC Markets Challenges CySEC’s €200,000 Fine
Abstract:IC Markets (EU) Ltd has announced plans to appeal a €200,000 fine imposed by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC).

IC Markets (EU) Ltd has announced plans to appeal a €200,000 fine imposed by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC). The fine pertains to allegations that the broker breached EU financial regulations concerning the marketing, distribution, and sale of Contracts for Differences (CFDs) to retail clients.
In a robust response, IC Markets argued that CySEC overlooked “irrefutable audited evidence” and relied on information provided by a former employee dismissed for misconduct. IC Markets claimed this ex-employee threatened the company with regulatory repercussions, alleging connections within CySEC. The broker asserts that CySEC's decision is based on assumptions and speculation, rather than solid evidence, challenging the fairness and integrity of the regulatory process.
According to IC Markets, CySEC's reliance on biased testimony while ignoring undeniable evidence suggests a pattern of selective and disproportionate application of regulatory authority, which they believe endangers transparency, market integrity, and fair competition.
The fine from CySEC relates to IC Markets' alleged failure to comply with article 42 of Regulation (EU) No. 600/2014, which governs markets in financial instruments. The broker is accused of engaging in activities that circumvented the requirements of paragraph 4(1)(a) of Directive DI87-09, which restricts the marketing, distribution, and sale of CFDs to retail clients, especially concerning initial margin protection.

The main allegation is that IC Markets offered a leverage ratio of up to 1:1000 through an offshore entity within the same group, bypassing the legal limit of 1:30. CySEC noted that IC Markets had committed a similar infraction in 2021 and had not implemented the promised corrective measures.
CySEC stated that the company engaged in actions aimed at circumventing the restrictive measures enacted to protect investors. The regulator decided to impose the fine during a meeting held on July 1, 2024, reflecting ongoing concerns about the broker's adherence to EU financial regulations.
IC Markets vehemently disputes CySEC's findings and has committed to appealing the fine. The broker contends that the regulatory decision is erroneous and pledges to pursue all available channels to overturn the penalty.
As this issue develops, it underscores significant concerns about the regulatory framework for financial instruments in the EU and the mechanisms designed to uphold market integrity and protect investors. The outcome of IC Markets' appeal will be closely monitored by industry participants and could have far-reaching consequences for the enforcement of financial regulations within the region.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Grand Capital Doesn’t Feel GRAND for Traders with Withdrawal Denials & Long Processing Times
The trading environment does not seem that rosy for traders at Grand Capital, a Seychelles-based forex broker. Traders’ requests for withdrawals are alleged to be in the review process for months, making them frustrated and helpless. Despite meeting the guidelines, traders find it hard to withdraw funds, as suggested by their complaints online. What’s also troubling traders are long processing times concerning Grand Capital withdrawals. In this Grand Capital review segment, we have shared some complaints for you to look at. Read on!

EmiraX Markets Withdrawal Issues Exposed
EmiraX Markets Review reveals unregulated status, fake license claims, and withdrawal issues. Stay safe and avoid this broker.

ADSS Review: Traders Say NO to Trading B’coz of Withdrawal Blocks, Account Freeze & Trade Issues
Does ADSS give you plenty of excuses to deny you access to withdrawals? Is your withdrawal request pending for months or years? Do you witness account freezes from the United Arab Emirates-based forex broker? Do you struggle to open and close your forex positions on the ADSS app? Does the customer support service fail to respond to your trading queries? All these issues have become a rage online. In this ADSS Broker review article, we have highlighted actual trader wordings on these issues. Keep reading!

INGOT Brokers Regulation 2025: ASIC vs Offshore License - What Traders Must Know
Explore INGOT Brokers regulation in 2025: Compare their ASIC and Seychelles FSA licenses, understand trader protection levels, and learn about potential risks in this detailed guide.
