Global Broker Regulation Inquiry App
WikiFX
English
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Apex Legal Limited Losses License
Abstract：Apex Legal Limited's recent license revocation by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on January 5, 2024, unveils regulatory concerns over the firm's lack of engagement in authorized activities, reflecting broader shifts in the FCA's approach towards ensuring active compliance in the financial sector.
The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) officially revoked Apex Legal Limited's Part 4A permission, effective January 5, 2024, as the Authority observed the firm's lack of engagement in any regulated activities covered by its Part 4A permission.
Apex Legal obtained FCA authorization on September 1, 2016, enabling specific regulated activities such as arranging investments, assisting in insurance contracts, acting as an agent in investments, organizing transactions in investments, and agreeing to regulated activity.
The FCA issued two notices to Apex Legal, expressing concerns about the firm's non-engagement in regulated activities aligned with its Part 4A permission and proposed cancellation. Despite these notices, Apex Legal did not take the required specified actions.
Information obtained from FCAs official website: https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/decision-notices/apex-legal-limited-2024.pdf
Consequently, the FCA decided to cancel Apex Legal's Part 4A permission. This decision aligns with the FCA's recent efforts to protect consumers by rescinding unused financial licenses across the UK. The regulatory changes empower the FCA to cancel licenses within 28 days, a significant shift from the previous 12-month timeline. This approach aims to ensure active participation in regulated activities by licensed firms, emphasizing the risk of losing licenses for non-compliance.
The FCA emphasizes that dormant licenses could mislead consumers, citing cases where firms with inactive licenses attracted investors to unregulated products, resulting in substantial financial losses. Recent data shows that in 2023, the regulator revoked licenses from 1,266 firms for failing to meet minimum authorization standards, indicating a doubled firm cancellation rate compared to the previous year.
In a landscape where financial regulations and firm compliance are crucial, staying informed is essential. To remain up-to-date with broker-related developments like this, leveraging the free WikiFX mobile application and official website is your best option. WikiFX serves as the ultimate destination for all broker-related inquiries and information. By downloading the app or visiting our official website, users gain access to comprehensive and real-time updates, making WikiFX your indispensable tool to navigate the dynamic world of brokers with confidence and clarity. Stay informed, stay empowered with WikiFX!
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more
In-Depth Uniglobe Markets Commission Fees and Spreads Analysis – What Traders Should Really Know
For experienced traders, the cost of execution is a critical factor in broker selection. Low spreads, fair commissions, and transparent pricing can be the difference between a profitable and a losing strategy over the long term. This has led many to scrutinize the offerings of brokers like Uniglobe Markets, which presents a tiered account structure promising competitive conditions. However, a professional evaluation demands more than a surface-level look at marketing claims. It requires a deep, data-driven analysis of the real trading costs, set against the backdrop of the broker's operational integrity and safety. This comprehensive Uniglobe Markets commission fees and spreads analysis will deconstruct the broker's pricing model, examining its account types, typical spreads, commission policies, and potential ancillary costs. Using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform WikiFX, we will provide a clear-eyed view of the Uniglobe Markets spreads commissions prici
Original 1m
In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Regulation and Oversight – A Trader's Guide to the Risks
For experienced traders, the process of selecting a new broker transcends a simple comparison of spreads and leverage. It is a meticulous due diligence exercise where the integrity of the broker's regulatory framework is paramount. Stonefort Securities, a relatively new entrant in the crowded brokerage space, presents a complex and often contradictory profile. On one hand, it boasts a modern MT5 platform and a stream of positive user testimonials. On the other hand, it is shadowed by severe regulatory warnings that question the very foundation of its operations. This in-depth review focuses on the core issue for any long-term trader: Stonefort Securities regulation and oversight. We will dissect the broker's corporate structure, scrutinize its licensing claims, and analyze what the data implies for trader protection and fund security. For traders evaluating whether Stonefort Securities is a trustworthy partner, understanding these details is not just important—it is essential.
Original 15m
FXPesa Review: Are Traders Facing High Slippage, Fund Losses & Withdrawal Denials?
Do FXPesa support officials fail to pick up your calls when you raise fund withdrawal requests with the broker? But are these officials always open to you regarding fund deposits? Do you frequently spot slippage and stop-loss order execution errors on the FXPesa login? These issues are increasingly becoming common with this forex broker. Consequently, many traders have expressed their dissatisfaction with the broker online. In this FXPesa Review article, we have shared some of these complaints. Take a look!
Original 29m
Trive Investigation: High Score, Hidden Risk - The Profit Paradox
A disturbing pattern has emerged regarding the broker Trive. Despite holding a high WikiFX score (7.91) and valid licenses in South Africa and Australia, recent investor reports suggest a significant disconnect between the platform's reputation and its treatment of profitable clients. While the regulatory paperwork appears in order, our data indicates that traders are facing sudden account freezes and accusations of "trading abuse" precisely when they attempt to withdraw profits. This report investigates why a seemingly "safe" broker is generating high-risk complaints.
Original 1h
WikiFX Broker
Latest News
WikiFX's New Evaluation of ATM Capital LTD: Does its License Protect the Arab Investor?
WikiFXIs Axi Legit? A Data-Driven Analysis of Its Regulatory Standing and Trader Feedback
WikiFXHow a Fake Moomoo Ad Led to the “New Dream Voyage 5” Scam
WikiFXTrive Investigation: High Score, Hidden Risk - The Profit Paradox
WikiFXBessent believes there won't be a recession in 2026 but says some sectors are challenged
WikiFXIs GGCC Legit? A Data-Driven Analysis for Experienced Traders
WikiFXYoung Singaporean Trader Grew USD 52 into a USD 107,700 Portfolio
WikiFXB2BROKER Gains Investment Bank Status in Labuan
WikiFXIn-Depth Review of INZO Trading Conditions and Product Offering – A Data-Driven Analysis
WikiFXMerin Regulation Review 2025: Is Merin a Safe and Legitimate Broker?
WikiFXCurrency Calculator
USD
CNY
Current Rate: 0
Amount
USD
Available
CNY
Calculate