简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SFC Penalizes Changjiang Corporate Finance for Serious Failings in Listing Applications
Abstract:SFC fines Changjiang Corporate Finance $20M for major lapses in six listing applications from 2015-2017. CJCF faces a year-long sponsorship ban, highlighting the need for rigorous due diligence in listings.

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has imposed a fine of $20 million on Changjiang Corporate Finance (HK) Limited (CJCF) for not meeting its responsibilities during six listing applications.
Summary of the Issue:
Between September 2015 and December 2017, CJCF submitted listing applications for six companies: Pacific Infinity Resources Holdings Limited, AsiaPac Net Media Holdings Limited, Perpetual Power Holdings Limited, Van Chuam International (Cayman) Limited, Rising Sun Construction Holdings Limited, and Byleasing Holdings Limited. The SFC's in-depth investigation revealed that CJCF:
Didn't thoroughly conduct due diligence for several applications.
Didn't provide proper guidance to some companies regarding listing qualifications.
Failed to disclose crucial details in the Application Proof prospectuses for multiple companies.
Didn't maintain accurate records of their due diligence efforts.
Additionally, CJCFs license has been partly suspended. For a year from 18 August 2023, they can't act as a sponsor for listing applications. This ban will be lifted either after the given period or once the SFC is convinced that CJCF has improved its internal processes.

Specific Failings:
Pacific Infinity: CJCF did not assess significant legislative changes in the Philippines, which posed a threat to Pacific Infinity's business. They also failed to disclose this information in the companys Application Proof prospectus.
AsiaPac: The company heavily relied on supplier discounts. CJCF failed to guide AsiaPac to disclose essential details about these discounts and their pricing strategy.
Perpetual Power: Despite the company not having the necessary certifications for two of its three hydropower plants, CJCF advised them to submit their listing application.
Van Chuam: CJCF did not conduct due diligence on the company's debt restructuring agreements and failed to provide essential information in the prospectus.
Rising Sun: CJCF did not verify the reasons behind the company's prolonged credit period and its potential impact.
Byleasing: CJCF gave poor advice about the track record period, leading to the SEHK returning the listing application.
Furthermore, the SFC found that CJCF didn't have proper records detailing the due diligence they claimed to have done for these listing applications. This careless behavior meant that the reliability of the information from the listing companies couldn't be confirmed.
Conclusion:
The SFC believes that CJCF's conduct was significantly below the expected standard for a sponsor. The penalty considers CJCF‘s extensive and grave deficiencies, the need for a deterrent for the industry, and CJCF’s financial situation. However, CJCFs cooperation in resolving the SFC's concerns and their clean disciplinary record were also noted.
Install the WikiFX App on your mobile device to keep abreast of recent news. Get the App at: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Seacrest Markets Exposed: Are You Facing Payout Denials and Spread Issues with This Prop Firm?
Seacrest Markets has garnered wrath from traders owing to a variety of reasons, including payout denials for traders winning trading challenges, high slippage causing losses, the lack of response from the customer support official to address withdrawal issues, and more. Irritated by these trading inefficiencies, a lot of traders have given a negative review of Seacrest Markets prop firm. In this article, we have shared some of them. Take a look!

GKFX Review: Are Traders Facing Slippage and Account Freeze Issues?
Witnessing capital losses despite tall investment return assurances by GKFX officials? Do these officials sound too difficult for you to judge, whether they offer real or fake advice? Do you encounter slippage issues causing a profit reduction on the GKFX login? Is account freezing usual at GKFX? Does the United Kingdom-based forex broker prevent you from accessing withdrawals? You are not alone! In this GKFX review guide, we have shared the complaints. Take a look!

Major Complaints of MUFG Broker in 2025 You Shouldn’t Ignore
2025 is about to end, and if you still want to be a trader or investor and are looking for a broker to invest with. It is important to read real user complaints first. This will help you understand the kind of problems users are facing with MUFG broker. In this article, we will tell you about the major complaints users have reported about MUFG in 2025, so you know what to watch out for. Do not ignore this MUFG broker article and understand the problems.

Europol Cyber-Patrol Week Targets $55M Crypto Piracy
Europol’s Cyber-Patrol Week exposed $55M in illicit crypto tied to IPTV piracy, disrupting sites and strengthening EU intellectual property enforcement.
