简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Swiss Banking Giant UBS To Pay $1.4B for Penalties
Abstract:UBS agrees to pay $1.44 billion in fines for alleged fraud in sale of mortgage-backed securities.

UBS, the prominent Swiss banking behemoth, has concurred to disburse a staggering $1.44 billion in fines to resolve allegations of fraud. The accusations pertain to the bank's purported misleading of investors in the United States through selling residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) in the lead-up to the tumultuous 2008 financial crisis. This significant development was officially communicated today (Monday) by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ).
Emerging from a legal entanglement initiated several years ago, the law enforcement agency had lodged claims that UBS engaged in fraudulent activities by providing false and deceptive information concerning 40 RMBS issued in 2006 and 2007. The crux of the allegations revolved around UBS's purported knowledge, as they had purportedly carried out exhaustive due diligence on the underlying loans before the issuance of the RMBS. This diligence was ostensibly conducted to ascertain the alignment of the loans with the representations intended for investors. Regrettably, the outcome saw the aforementioned 40 RMBS incurring substantial financial losses.

Furthermore, the agency emphasized that this settlement culminates the final case pursued by its dedicated task forces, which were established to scrutinize the actions of financial institutions and other pertinent actors during the financial crisis.
It is worth noting that before this resolution, the DOJ had secured agreements to settle akin allegations of fraud against other significant financial entities such as Nomura Holdings, the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), Merrill Lynch, and Barclays. Consequently, in conjunction with the fresh accord reached with UBS, the collective tally of penalties imposed on banks, loan originators, and rating agencies ensnared within the ambit of the DOJ's investigation has now surpassed a formidable $36 billion, as iterated by the justice department.
Nevertheless, the agency underscored that the allegations resolved through the settlement with UBS remain just allegations. This stipulation implies that UBS has not admitted to any wrongdoing. In tandem, UBS validated the settlement in an issued statement, revealing that the financial provision for this settlement had been accounted for in the preceding periods.
“The substantial civil penalty, in this case, serves as a warning to other players in the financial markets who seek to unlawfully profit through fraud that we will hold them accountable no matter how long it takes,” declared Breon Peace, the US Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, accentuating the significance of the agreement.
He underscored the DOJ's unwavering dedication to safeguarding financial markets, investors, and the general public against deceitful practices. The amassed sum of over $36 billion, designated for behaviours that exacerbated the 2008 financial crisis, is a poignant testament to the Department of Justice's steadfast commitment, added Peace.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Grand Capital Doesn’t Feel GRAND for Traders with Withdrawal Denials & Long Processing Times
The trading environment does not seem that rosy for traders at Grand Capital, a Seychelles-based forex broker. Traders’ requests for withdrawals are alleged to be in the review process for months, making them frustrated and helpless. Despite meeting the guidelines, traders find it hard to withdraw funds, as suggested by their complaints online. What’s also troubling traders are long processing times concerning Grand Capital withdrawals. In this Grand Capital review segment, we have shared some complaints for you to look at. Read on!

ADSS Review: Traders Say NO to Trading B’coz of Withdrawal Blocks, Account Freeze & Trade Issues
Does ADSS give you plenty of excuses to deny you access to withdrawals? Is your withdrawal request pending for months or years? Do you witness account freezes from the United Arab Emirates-based forex broker? Do you struggle to open and close your forex positions on the ADSS app? Does the customer support service fail to respond to your trading queries? All these issues have become a rage online. In this ADSS Broker review article, we have highlighted actual trader wordings on these issues. Keep reading!

INGOT Brokers Regulation 2025: ASIC vs Offshore License - What Traders Must Know
Explore INGOT Brokers regulation in 2025: Compare their ASIC and Seychelles FSA licenses, understand trader protection levels, and learn about potential risks in this detailed guide.

INGOT Brokers Review 2025: High Risk or Hidden Gem? Expert Analysis Reveals All
Comprehensive INGOT Brokers review exploring the broker's mixed reputation in 2025. Discover the truth about regulation, trading options, and user experiences before opening an account.
