简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC says Binance clients in the U.S. have $2.2 billion “at significant risk."
Abstract:The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has raised concerns over the safety of $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance's U.S. subsidiary.

Recently, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed multiple charges against cryptocurrency exchange Binance, its affiliated entities, and CEO Changpeng Zhao, alleging illegal operations and the violation of securities laws. Click this link below for more details.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has raised concerns over the safety of $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance's U.S. subsidiary. The regulatory body has filed an emergency motion, claiming that the cryptocurrency exchange and its founder, Changpeng Zhao, maintain effective control over these funds.
Safety Concerns Surrounding Binance U.S. Customer Assets
The SEC's alarm stems from what they perceive as an insufficient level of assurance regarding the safety of the $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance U.S. Despite operating as a separate entity from its parent company, Binance's U.S. subsidiary has come under scrutiny due to perceived control exerted by the primary business and its founder.
SEC's Emergency Motion
To address their concerns, the SEC has taken legal action by filing an emergency motion with a federal court. The motion argues that Binance's main business, in conjunction with Changpeng Zhao, maintains effective control over the billions of dollars of customer funds held by Binance U.S. The regulatory body's aim is to obtain a temporary restraining order to freeze these assets until the situation is clarified and the safety of the funds can be ensured.
Protection of Binance U.S. Clients
The SEC's intervention is driven by the objective of protecting the assets and interests of Binance U.S. clients. By seeking a temporary restraining order, the regulatory body aims to mitigate any potential risks associated with the $2.2 billion in customer assets. This measure would enable the SEC to gain control over the situation and ensure that clients' funds are safeguarded.
Binance's Response
As of now, Binance has not issued an official statement in response to the SEC's emergency motion. However, it is worth noting that the cryptocurrency exchange has faced regulatory scrutiny in the past. Binance has made efforts to comply with regulations by establishing a separate U.S. subsidiary to cater specifically to American customers. Nonetheless, the SEC's concerns about the control exerted by Binance's main business raise questions about the efficacy of these measures.
Conclusion
The SEC's recent emergency motion highlights significant concerns surrounding the safety of $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance's U.S. subsidiary. While the regulatory body acknowledges the separate legal entity status of Binance U.S., it argues that the primary business and Changpeng Zhao still wield effective control over these funds. With the objective of protecting Binance U.S. clients, the SEC is seeking a temporary restraining order to freeze these assets until the situation is clarified. This move underscores the ongoing need for regulatory oversight in the cryptocurrency industry and the importance of ensuring the security of customer assets.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
