简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
JPMorgan Examines Trader Oversight in the Face of Financial Market Boom - Sources
Abstract:JPMorgan Chase & Co. is collaborating with KPMG to enhance how the U.S. bank monitors its traders, according to individuals familiar with the assessment, as Wall Street grapples with how to detect possible misbehavior amid a securities trading boom.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. is collaborating with KPMG to enhance how the U.S. bank monitors its traders, according to individuals familiar with the assessment, as Wall Street grapples with how to detect possible misbehavior amid a securities trading boom.
According to the sources, KPMG is looking at JPMorgan's worldwide control of traders throughout the bank's market business. The bank's income from buying and selling bonds, currencies, and equities increased to $29 billion in 2022, making it the highest among the top five banks in the United States and a near-record high.
Market volatility intensified towards the onset of the pandemic, and trading activity at investment banks and securities companies soared, adding to the burden of overseeing personnel amid greater quantities of buying and selling and big price fluctuations.
The CBOE Volatility Index, a measure of market volatility, is still higher than it was before the epidemic.
When asked why it engaged KPMG, JPMorgan stated, “We spend extensively in our compliance and surveillance systems and often engage third parties to benchmark our capabilities.”
“Such activities should not be misconstrued for anything else,” the bank said in a statement.
KPMG's London spokesperson refused to comment.
ALERTS AND WARNINGS
Compliance teams at investment banks that monitor traders depend on automated system warnings and alerts to identify and prevent any wrongdoing, which if unnoticed might result in substantial losses for the banks and regulatory attention.
JPMorgan agreed to pay a $920 million penalty and enter into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement with the US Department of Justice in 2020 for market manipulation at its trading desks in New York, London, and Hong Kong.
The bank agreed to improve its compliance efforts and disclose fixes to the DoJ under the agreement, which expires this year.
Banks must disclose suspicious transactions to watchdogs as part of their regulatory requirements when there are reasonable reasons to suspect ill intent, such as possible insider trading or market manipulation.
When market prices fluctuate abruptly and trade volumes increase, the automated systems used by banks to monitor trading may generate an avalanche of signals of anomalous behavior, making it more difficult for supervisors to discover possible conduct violations.
One such occurrence occurred in September 2022, when former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss' extreme tax-cutting measures created havoc in the British government bond market. According to one of the individuals, the volatility in UK government bonds, known as gilts, generated a deluge of compliance warnings from JPMorgan's traders.
Britain's borrowing prices rose by the most in decades, prompting the Bank of England to intervene with an emergency package to calm markets. Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England, said that circumstances in gilt trading at the time were extraordinary.
According to a second source, KPMG has conducted a review of the technology used by the financial sector to regulate trade and is currently advising JPMorgan on how to alter its systems.
According to the first source, certain modifications are already being tried, including limiting the number of warnings to compliance departments in some sectors of trade.
The number of so-called suspicious transaction and order reports reported by financial services businesses to Britain's finance watchdog, the Financial Conduct Authority, to identify possible dangers climbed by 15% in 2021, according to the regulator's most recent accessible statistics.
According to the FCA statistics, the most common danger seemed to be possible insider trading.
Keep an eye out for more Forex news.
Install the WikiFX App on your smartphone to keep up to speed on current events.
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
