简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
ASIC Suspends Unlicensed CFD Traders For Ten Years
Abstract:The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has barred Mark Jennings of Queensland from providing financial services or managing any financial services business entity for 10 years.

He was formerly employed as a Director at Suncoast Trading (operated as Equity Trade).
He promised customers guaranteed large profits on managed CFDs trading.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has barred Mark Jennings of Queensland from providing financial services or managing any financial services business entity for 10 years.

Jennings was found to have fraudulently promoted that he could deliver guaranteed profits from contracts for differences (CFDs) trading and providing services without the requisite license, according to an announcement made on Tuesday.
Jennings is a former Director of Suncoast Trading Pty Ltd (formerly Equity Trade), a trading business that is now in liquidation. The firm went bankrupt after suffering huge losses while trading with customer funds.
According to the Australian authority, Jennings advertised for Equity Trade with high guaranteed profits for his clientele. He promised to be able to generate “50%, 100%, or 200% each year GUARANTEED RETURNS.”
Furthermore, according to the Equity Trade website, the company's investments are “recession-proof” since they earn from “both rising and declining markets.” And all of these services were provided without a license.
According to ASIC, Jennings conducted his investment firm without an Australia Financial Service (AFS) license, which is required for such activities. There was also evidence of money laundering, as he forced certain customers to put monies into his personal trading account and trade CFDs without consulting them.
Furthermore, he was accused of making fraudulent and deceptive statements about assured profits. Indeed, traders may benefit from both rising and declining markets when using CFDs. However, these products are exceedingly dangerous, and the vast majority of ordinary traders lose money while trading CFDs. Retail brokers are even required by UK and European authorities to reveal the proportion of their customers that lose money.
Furthermore, Jennings presented the regulator with incorrect or misleading information about the number of Equity Trade customers and the degree of their losses. Furthermore, the regulator determined that he is not appropriately qualified or competent to provide financial services and “is likely to violate a financial services legislation.”
Crackdowns by ASIC
Australia is regarded as one of the more developed CFDs marketplaces. Several well-known retail brokers have their headquarters in the country, and several foreign firms are developing there as well. Meanwhile, ASIC maintains rigorous industry restrictions and enforces severe limitations on leverage and marketing practices until May 2027.
ASIC banned a former manager of CFDs broker Trade360 for eight years earlier this month, criticizing him for not being “adequately qualified and competent.” Meanwhile, earlier this year, the regulator got a court judgment against another trader, condemning him to jail for nine months for trading CFDs using insider knowledge.
About ASIC
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is an independent Australian government entity that serves as Australia's business regulator. It was founded on July 1, 1998, in response to the Wallis Inquiry's recommendations. The purpose of ASIC is to enforce and regulate corporate and financial services laws in order to safeguard Australian consumers, investors, and creditors. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act, of 2001 established ASIC's jurisdiction and scope.
Stay tuned for more Forex Regulatory news.
Download the WikiFX App from the App Store or Google Play Store to stay updated on the latest news.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
