简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Australian unions extend strike at Shell’s LNG facility
Abstract:Unions extended industrial action on Tuesday until Aug. 11 over a long-running wage dispute at Shell Plc’s Prelude floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility.

The Offshore Alliance and the Electrical Trades Union said they extended bans on tasks such as transfer and supply of hydrocarbons or any other products from the facility off northwestern Australia.
Shell began shutting down the 3.6-million-tonne-a-year site this month and told customers it would be unable to supply cargoes for the duration of work stoppages approved by Australias Fair Work Commission, or protected industrial action (PIA).
Shell has told workers it would not resume talks on a new wage agreement until they called off the stoppages, begun on June 10.
“We need your help to lift the PIA so we can get back to the bargaining table and normal operations,” Shells Prelude asset manager Peter Norman told workers in a letter on Monday, seen by Reuters.
In the letter, Shell said it was calling off a planned lock-out of workers to enable safety-critical work, and would pro-rate pay for those doing partial work because of the work stoppages.
On Tuesday, the Offshore Alliance‘s spokesperson Daniel Walton said that while Shell rejected the union’s offer last week for mediation through the Fair Work Commission, it still stood.
“Negotiations should always be a dialogue, not a game of chicken,” Walton said.
The Offshore Alliance is using an April pay deal with Japans Inpex Corp at its Ichthys LNG operation as a benchmark for talks with other oil and gas majors.
Inpex agreed to base rates of pay between A$125,000 and A$258,000 ($86,000 and $178,000) plus allowances, up from between A$92,000 and A$102,000.
Prelude is co-owned by Shell, Inpex, Korea Gas Corp (KOGAS), and Taiwans state-run Chinese Petroleum Corp.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
