Global Broker Regulation Inquiry App
WikiFX
English
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
ANA’s low-cost arm to resume flights to Seoul after 2-1/2 years, source says
Abstract：The low-cost carrier arm of Japan’s ANA Holdings, Peach Aviation, is set to resume flights to Seoul from late August, according to a person familiar with the matter, after a 2-1/2-year halt due to the pandemic and strict border measures.
Peach will make six round trip flights a week between Osaka‘s Kansai International Airport and South Korea’s Incheon International Airport starting on Aug. 28, the person said, declining to be identified because the information has not been made public.
The resumption of flights is the latest sign of Japan‘s slow emergence from some of the world’s strictest border measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
A Peach spokesperson declined to comment, saying the information was not something announced by the company.
The resumption comes as COVID-19 cases in South Korea are seen falling, and as there are expectations that strained bilateral relations will improve under the new administration of South Korean President Yoon Seok-youl.
Peach was forced to cut back services in 2019 when tension flared up between the two countries and the number of passengers to Japan fell. It then halted almost all of its international flight services in March 2020 due to the spread of COVID-19.
It temporarily restored flights to Taipei in 2021, but services between major Japanese cities to 17 international destinations including Shanghai and Hong Kong have not been resumed. Its international services made up about a half of its revenues.
Flights between Tokyo‘s Haneda Airport and Seoul’s Gimpo International Airport are also set to resume on Wednesday, with Korean Air Lines Co Ltd and Asiana Airlines Inc to be first.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Long
Short
Slippage
Leverage
Indicator
Quoted currency
Roll-Over
FED
ECB
BOJ
US Non-farm Payrolls
Deficit
Quantitative easing
FOMC
GDP
Hawkish
Dove
Macro
Base rate
Broker
Clearing
Commission
Currency Pair
Dealer
Future
Inflation
Liquidation
Market capitalization
Value Date
Hedging
Lock
Market depth
Fundamental analysis
Technical analysis
BIS
Asian session
G7
G8
Arbitrage
Spot Market
Spot Price
Contract
Interest
Net Position
Devaluation
BOE
PBOC
Volume
Liquidity
Margin
RokingLTD
knowledge
Learn basic forex
Forex trading
Forex margin
Forex Chart
Forex indicator
support and resistance
Forex Broker
Forex strategy
Forex Currency pair
Forex Analysis
Forex news
leverage in forex
forex pips
Basic forex knowledge
forex market
forex beginners
FSCA
monetary policy
mortgage-backed securities
interest rates
inflationary
Non-farm payrolls
Ramadan
Read more
In-Depth Uniglobe Markets Commission Fees and Spreads Analysis – What Traders Should Really Know
For experienced traders, the cost of execution is a critical factor in broker selection. Low spreads, fair commissions, and transparent pricing can be the difference between a profitable and a losing strategy over the long term. This has led many to scrutinize the offerings of brokers like Uniglobe Markets, which presents a tiered account structure promising competitive conditions. However, a professional evaluation demands more than a surface-level look at marketing claims. It requires a deep, data-driven analysis of the real trading costs, set against the backdrop of the broker's operational integrity and safety. This comprehensive Uniglobe Markets commission fees and spreads analysis will deconstruct the broker's pricing model, examining its account types, typical spreads, commission policies, and potential ancillary costs. Using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform WikiFX, we will provide a clear-eyed view of the Uniglobe Markets spreads commissions prici
Original 45m
In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Regulation and Oversight – A Trader's Guide to the Risks
For experienced traders, the process of selecting a new broker transcends a simple comparison of spreads and leverage. It is a meticulous due diligence exercise where the integrity of the broker's regulatory framework is paramount. Stonefort Securities, a relatively new entrant in the crowded brokerage space, presents a complex and often contradictory profile. On one hand, it boasts a modern MT5 platform and a stream of positive user testimonials. On the other hand, it is shadowed by severe regulatory warnings that question the very foundation of its operations. This in-depth review focuses on the core issue for any long-term trader: Stonefort Securities regulation and oversight. We will dissect the broker's corporate structure, scrutinize its licensing claims, and analyze what the data implies for trader protection and fund security. For traders evaluating whether Stonefort Securities is a trustworthy partner, understanding these details is not just important—it is essential.
Original 54m
FXPesa Review: Are Traders Facing High Slippage, Fund Losses & Withdrawal Denials?
Do FXPesa support officials fail to pick up your calls when you raise fund withdrawal requests with the broker? But are these officials always open to you regarding fund deposits? Do you frequently spot slippage and stop-loss order execution errors on the FXPesa login? These issues are increasingly becoming common with this forex broker. Consequently, many traders have expressed their dissatisfaction with the broker online. In this FXPesa Review article, we have shared some of these complaints. Take a look!
Original 1h
Trive Investigation: High Score, Hidden Risk - The Profit Paradox
A disturbing pattern has emerged regarding the broker Trive. Despite holding a high WikiFX score (7.91) and valid licenses in South Africa and Australia, recent investor reports suggest a significant disconnect between the platform's reputation and its treatment of profitable clients. While the regulatory paperwork appears in order, our data indicates that traders are facing sudden account freezes and accusations of "trading abuse" precisely when they attempt to withdraw profits. This report investigates why a seemingly "safe" broker is generating high-risk complaints.
Original 1h
WikiFX Broker
Latest News
WikiFX's New Evaluation of ATM Capital LTD: Does its License Protect the Arab Investor?
WikiFXHow a Fake Moomoo Ad Led to the “New Dream Voyage 5” Scam
WikiFXIs Axi Legit? A Data-Driven Analysis of Its Regulatory Standing and Trader Feedback
WikiFXFXPesa Review: Are Traders Facing High Slippage, Fund Losses & Withdrawal Denials?
WikiFXTrive Investigation: High Score, Hidden Risk - The Profit Paradox
WikiFXIn-Depth Uniglobe Markets Commission Fees and Spreads Analysis – What Traders Should Really Know
WikiFXBessent believes there won't be a recession in 2026 but says some sectors are challenged
WikiFXIs GGCC Legit? A Data-Driven Analysis for Experienced Traders
WikiFXYoung Singaporean Trader Grew USD 52 into a USD 107,700 Portfolio
WikiFXIn-Depth Review of INZO Trading Conditions and Product Offering – A Data-Driven Analysis
WikiFXCurrency Calculator
USD
CNY
Current Rate: 0
Amount
USD
Available
CNY
Calculate