简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Treasury Targets Sanctions Evasion Networks and Russian Technology Companies Enabling Putin’s War
Abstract:Treasury also expands sanctions authorities to include aerospace, marine, and electronics sectors
WASHINGTON — Today, the Department of the Treasury‘s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is continuing to impose severe costs on the Russian Federation for its unprovoked and unjustified war against Ukraine by targeting operators in the Russian technology sector to prevent it from evading unprecedented multilateral sanctions and procure critical western technology. OFAC is designating 21 entities and 13 individuals as part of its crackdown on the Kremlin’s sanctions evasion networks and technology companies, which are instrumental to the Russian Federation‘s war machine. Treasury has also determined that three new sectors of the Russian Federation economy are subject to sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 14024 (E.O. 14024). This allows Treasury impose sanctions on any individual or entity determined to operate or have operated in any of those sectors. Today’s sanctions are a part of the Administration‘s comprehensive response to Russia’s to restrict their access to resources, sectors of their economy that are essential to supplying and financing the continued invasion of Ukraine.
“Russia not only continues to violate the sovereignty of Ukraine with its unprovoked aggression but also has escalated its attacks striking civilians and population centers,” said Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen. “We will continue to target Putins war machine with sanctions from every angle, until this senseless war of choice is over.”
One of the technology companies designated today exports more than 50 percent of Russian microelectronics and is Russia‘s largest chipmaker. This follows OFAC’s March 24 designation of dozens of companies in Russia‘s defense-industrial base that are directly supporting Putin’s unjustified war against the people of Ukraine. Treasury took todays action in close coordination with our partners who are similarly committed to ensuring the Russian Federation is not exploiting their jurisdictions for its destructive aims.
Additionally, today OFAC is designating Russian government malicious cyber actors. The United States will continue to hold Putins cyber actors accountable for destructive, disruptive or otherwise destabilizing cyber activity targeting the United States and its allies and partners.
Today‘s actions demonstrate the U.S. government’s commitment to countering the evasion of sanctions that the United States and our allies and partners have put in place to impose unprecedented costs on the Russian Federation for its aggression against Ukraine. The Treasury Department will use all authorities at its disposal to enforce sanctions against the Russian government and its proxies.
RUSSIAN SANCTIONS EVASION NETWORKS
Moscow-based OOO Serniya Engineering (Serniya) is at the center of a procurement network engaged in proliferation activities at the direction of Russian Intelligence Services. This network operates across multiple countries to obfuscate the Russian military and intelligence agency end-users that rely on critical western technology. Serniya and Moscow-based OOO Sertal (Sertal) work to illicitly procure dual-use equipment and technology for Russias defense sector. Russia-based OOO Robin Treid, United Kingdom-based Majory LLP, United Kingdom-based Photon Pro LLP, and Spain-based Invention Bridge SL are front companies utilized by Serniya to facilitate its procurement of key equipment for the Government of the Russian Federation (GoR). Within the past month, the European Union and Japan have placed export-related restrictions on Serniya, Sertal, and Photon Pro. The UK is also taking coordinated action on the companies within its jurisdiction.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
