简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Several US State Regulators Crack Down on Voyager Digital
Abstract:Canada-listed Voyager Digital (TSX: VOYG) confirmed on Wednesday that several state regulators in the United States are scrutinizing its services for offering interest-bearing cryptocurrency accounts.

At least eight state regulators have issued some kind of order against the company.
They are alleging the crypto company offerings unregistered securities.
Q4 2021 volumes have gone up or down and how much?
According to the cryptocurrency company, it has already received or is expecting to get cease and desist orders from the financial supervisors of Indiana, Kentucky, New Jersey and Oklahoma. Additionally, the state securities division of Alabama, Texas, Vermont and Washington have issued show-cause orders to the company.
All of these orders are asserting that Voyager Earn Accounts fall under the category of security and investment contracts, thus violating the state securities regulations.
However, Voyager is convinced that its offerings are not securities and is intending to defend its position. “Voyager supports appropriate regulation and will do its best to demonstrate to these regulators that Voyager has complied with the law,” the company stated.
Though Voyager is still seeking further clarification on all of the regulatory orders, it pointed out that a few of them would prohibit it from offering interest-bearing crypto accounts, while three of them are seeking monetary penalties.
“It is Voyagers expectation that most of these state orders will provide a transition period prior to becoming effective,” the company added.
US Regulators against Crypto Lending Platforms
The crackdown of the US state regulators against crypto lending platforms is not new. Before, several state regulators issued similar orders against popular platforms like BlockFi and Celsius, alleging violation of state laws.
An earlier media report even revealed that the US federal financial market supervisor, the Securities and Exchange Commission, is probing the offerings of several crypto companies, including Voyager Digital.
Furthermore, BlockFi became the first of these companies to settle with these federal and state regulators, paying $100 million and agreeing to several conditions like suspension of adding new US accounts.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | Kazuaki Takabatake, CCO of Titan FX
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr
