简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Saxo Bank Ensures Platform Compliance amid FSA Flagging
Abstract:Denmark-headquartered broker, Saxo Bank released a statement on Wednesday, highlighting its platform is fully compliant with the European regulatory requirements. Its controls around transaction reporting are also in place.

The regulator acknowledged that the broker implemented all the necessary controls.
“This is a matter we take very seriously,” said Saxos Chief Risk and Compliance Officer.
The statement came after the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) flagged the broker for lapses in its transaction reporting system which were in violation of the MiFIR. As per the regulator, the broker did not take reasonable measures till 30 June 2021, to ensure the completion, accuracy and timely submission of the transaction reports.
“This is a matter we take very seriously,” Saxo Banks Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, Steen Blaafalk said in a statement.
“In the period from 2018 until the summer of 2021, we have unfortunately had shortcomings in our transaction reports, just as we did not have sufficient control bodies in the area. We have since strengthened our reporting systems and procedures so that we can correct the deficient transaction reports and ensure that the sources of error in our systems were rectified from the second half of 2021, which the Danish FSA also notes in their report.”
Indeed, the Danish supervisory agency pointed out that Saxo had already implemented all the controls aimed at preventing deficiencies in transaction reports in 2021.
Demand Is Increasing
Meanwhile, Saxo remains one of the major brokers in the retail space. It reported a 4.6 percent jump in 2021 trading volume, but profits for the year came in flat at DKK 755 million.
The broker onboarded a record number of 263,000 new clients on its trading platform last year, thus closing the year with 820,000 total clients. Furthermore, trading volume on Saxo jumped this year.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
